Victorian Evidence Base · September 2026

Natural Disasters and Family Violence in Victoria: An LGA-Level Evidence Base

This analysis links publicly available disaster declaration, household impact, and family violence data at the Local Government Area level. It identifies a structural gap in Australia's disaster recovery funding framework and outlines the data required to quantify it.

106,430 FV incidents recorded, 2024–25 (CSA 2025)
+7.7% Single-year increase (largest on record)
53 DRFA-declared disasters since Oct 2020
17 LGAs with published dwelling impact data

Background

Natural disasters increase the incidence of domestic and family violence. This relationship has been documented in peer-reviewed research across multiple countries, disaster types, and methodologies. Parkinson (2019) observed increased family violence following the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires. Gearhart et al. (2018) found significant post-disaster increases in domestic violence across US events. True (2013) established the link in Pacific disaster contexts. Victoria's Royal Commission into Family Violence (2016) recognised natural disasters as a risk factor for family violence.

The established causal pathways include displacement from housing, financial stress, loss of community support infrastructure, disrupted service access, and trauma. These conditions are present in the aftermath of every major natural disaster.

The funding gap

Australia's Disaster Recovery Funding Arrangements (DRFA) allocate Commonwealth and state resources on the basis of immediate physical damage: dwellings destroyed, infrastructure lost, and roads damaged. Spending thresholds trigger escalating levels of federal cost-sharing (Categories A through D). This model is structurally blind to the social consequences that the peer-reviewed literature identifies as predictable outcomes of household-level disaster impact, including family violence, displacement, and mental health deterioration.

No DRFA trigger exists for proactive family violence service funding. There is no "social consequence multiplier" in the formula. Services in disaster-affected areas absorb increased demand from existing budgets or rely on ad hoc grants allocated after the need has already materialised.

Purpose of this analysis

This evidence base assembles publicly available data at the LGA level to support a quantitative assessment of the relationship between disaster impact severity and family violence incidence in Victoria. It identifies two critical data gaps that, if addressed through data requests to the Crime Statistics Agency and Emergency Management Victoria, would enable a dose-response model suitable for informing DRFA reform.

Scope and limitations. This analysis covers Victorian DRFA-declared events from October 2020 to September 2026. Family violence data is drawn from CSA annual publications (2020–21 through 2024–25) and earlier CSA annual data (calendar years 2010–2014). Per-LGA household impact data has been compiled from council reports, parliamentary submissions, and government recovery publications for five major events, covering 17 of the 79 Victorian LGAs. The analysis does not claim to establish causation from statewide trends alone; the purpose is to identify the data and methodology required to do so.

Key findings

Statewide trend

Family violence incidents recorded by Victoria Police rose from 93,439 in 2020–21 to 106,430 in 2024–25. The largest single-year increase of 7,619 incidents (+7.7%) occurred in 2024–25, following sustained major disaster activity across multiple LGAs in the preceding 24 months (CSA 2025).

Disaster frequency

Victoria experienced 53 DRFA-declared events since October 2020. The October 2022 floods (AGRN 1037) affected 63 LGAs and damaged 5,017 buildings (AIDR 2023). Baw Baw Shire was included in 16 separate declarations — the most of any Victorian LGA.

LGA-level household impact data

Published data on per-LGA household impacts was identified for five major events. These figures are compiled from council annual reports, parliamentary inquiry submissions, government recovery publications, and independent reviews — not from a centralised source.

EventAGRNLGAs with dwelling dataKey figures
2019–20 Bushfires882East Gippsland, Towong, Alpine346 dwellings destroyed in East Gippsland; 38 primary residences in Towong (council reports)
June 2021 Storms969Yarra Ranges, Hepburn, + 9 councils71 destroyed, 54 damaged, 60 severely damaged in Yarra Ranges (Parliamentary Hansard)
October 2022 Floods1037Campaspe, Gr. Shepparton, Maribyrnong, Mitchell, Gannawarra988 homes inundated in Rochester; 4,000 properties isolated in Shepparton (VAGO 2025; council recovery plans)
Dec 2023 – Jan 2024 Storms1096Greater Bendigo, Mitchell, Loddon113 above-floor dwellings in Bendigo; 17 in Loddon (parliamentary submissions; local media)
Feb 2024 Storms1108Yarra Ranges (power outage data)37 homes left uninhabitable statewide; 500,000 lost power (AER 2024)
Analytical constraint. With only annual FV data and household impact figures for a subset of LGAs, the statewide trend is consistent with the established research but cannot alone establish the dose-response relationship at the LGA level. The analysis required to quantify "X dwellings damaged → Y additional FV incidents → Z dollars of service funding" depends on two unpublished datasets identified in the Data Sources tab.

Major disaster events since 2020

AGRNDateHazardLGAs affectedNotes
1037Oct 2022Flood655,017 buildings affected across 63 LGAs (AIDR 2023)
969Jun 2021Flood/Storm41Category C/D with AGDRP payments; 330,000 lost power
983Oct 2021Storm39Category C/D
1108Feb 2024Storm41Category C/D; 620,000 homes lost power (AER 2024)
1242Jan 2026Bushfire38Category C/D — most recent major event
1096Dec 2023Storm29Category C/D; $1.61B insured losses nationally (ICA)
1147Aug 2024Storm28Category C/D
882Nov 2019Bushfire18458 houses impacted (IGEM Phase 1); $2.32B national insured losses

Disaster exposure and family violence trends by LGA

The table below compares family violence trends across 20 Victorian LGAs, grouped by disaster exposure level. The 13 LGAs with six or more DRFA-declared events since 2020 include the state's most disaster-affected communities. Seven metropolitan LGAs with three or fewer events are included for comparison. Family violence data is sourced from CSA annual publications (2020–21 through 2024–25).

LGA DRFA Events FV 2020–21 FV 2024–25 Change (%) Major events
Baw Baw211,0281,280+24.5%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms
Yarra Ranges181,7272,041+18.2%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms, Jan 2026 Bushfires
East Gippsland161,5672,499+59.5%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms, Jan 2026 Bushfires
Wellington161,3431,508+12.3%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms, Jan 2026 Bushfires
South Gippsland15532604+13.5%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms
Macedon Ranges13444544+22.5%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms, Jan 2026 Bushfires
Latrobe92,5223,022+19.8%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms
Greater Shepparton81,6232,442+50.5%Oct 2022 Floods, Jan 2026 Bushfires
Greater Geelong84,3185,586+29.4%Oct 2022 Floods, Feb 2024 Storms
Cardinia81,5502,079+34.1%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms
Wodonga77691,116+45.1%Oct 2022 Floods, Jan 2026 Bushfires
Mitchell71,2231,378+12.7%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms, Jan 2026 Bushfires
Ballarat62,3673,020+27.6%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms
Comparison — metropolitan LGAs with low disaster exposure
Monash31,8091,923+6.3%Jun 2021 Storms, Feb 2024 Storms
Hume24,1833,885−7.1%Oct 2022 Floods, Jun 2021 Storms
Brimbank22,9892,898−3.0%Oct 2022 Floods
Whitehorse21,4611,495+2.3%Jun 2021 Storms, Feb 2024 Storms
Wyndham13,9754,151+4.4%Oct 2022 Floods
Melbourne12,1382,178+1.9%Oct 2022 Floods
Hobsons Bay11,0861,078−0.7%Oct 2021 Storms

Among the 13 high-exposure LGAs examined, the mean increase in recorded family violence incidents between 2020–21 and 2024–25 was 28.4%. Among the seven metropolitan comparison LGAs with three or fewer DRFA events, the mean change was 0.6% over the same period. The statewide average increase was 13.9%. East Gippsland — affected by 16 separate DRFA-declared events including the 2019–20 Black Summer bushfires and the October 2022 floods — recorded the largest proportional increase, with incidents rising from 1,567 to 2,499 (+59.5%). Greater Shepparton, where over 4,000 properties were isolated or inundated during the October 2022 floods, recorded the second-largest increase (+50.5%).

These patterns are consistent with the established literature on post-disaster family violence. However, the annual resolution of currently available CSA data limits the capacity to attribute changes to specific events. LGAs with small populations (such as Towong, Mansfield, and Murrindindi) show volatile year-to-year movements that may reflect statistical noise rather than systematic trends. The monthly data identified in Recommendation 1 would enable event-level analysis.

Year-on-year percentage change in family violence incidents by LGA, 2010–2025

The table below presents year-on-year percentage change in recorded family violence incidents for all 79 Victorian LGAs across 15 calendar-year transitions from 2010 to 2025. The full 16-year series provides ten years of pre-disaster baseline data (2010–2019) alongside the period since DRFA-declared disasters commenced in Victoria in late 2020. The vertical divider and teal header mark the beginning of the DRFA era: columns to its left show trends during a decade of normal variation, while columns to its right show trends during sustained natural disaster activity. Cells are coloured on a red-to-green gradient: dark red indicates an increase exceeding 20 per cent, orange 10–20 per cent, light yellow 0–10 per cent, light green a decrease of up to 10 per cent, and dark green a decrease exceeding 10 per cent. LGAs are sorted by total DRFA event declarations in descending order, with baseline (zero-event) LGAs separated at the bottom. Where DRFA-declared disasters commenced in the corresponding calendar year, a small badge shows the event count. The critical comparison is whether disaster-affected LGAs — which showed normal variation before 2020 — exhibit distinctly different trends in the DRFA era.

Legend: >+20% +10–20% +0–10% −0–10% <−10% ● = DRFA events in that year = DRFA era boundary

Loading heatmap data…

Statistical analysis: disaster exposure and family violence

The heatmap above shows volatile year-to-year movements across all exposure groups. To determine whether the observed pattern is statistically meaningful — or simply noise in annual data — we apply panel econometric methods, hypothesis tests, and correlation analysis to the full 79-LGA × 16-year dataset. All tests use publicly available annual data. Standard errors are heteroskedasticity-robust (HC1).

Table S1: Summary statistics by disaster exposure group

Mean annual YoY percentage change in FV incidents, grouped by total DRFA event exposure. The pre-disaster period covers 2011–2019 transitions; the post-disaster period covers 2020–2025 transitions.

Exposure group LGAs Pre-disaster (2011–2019) Post-disaster (2020–2025)
Mean % SD n Mean % SD n

Table S2: Regression results

Panel regressions with LGA and year fixed effects on log FV incidents. The dependent variable is ln(1 + FV incidents). Fixed effects absorb baseline differences between LGAs and common annual trends, isolating the within-LGA effect of disaster exposure.

Model Coefficient % effect SE p-value 95% CI

Table S3: Hypothesis tests and correlations

Tests of parallel trends (pre-disaster), post-disaster divergence, event-study comparisons for AGRN 1037 (October 2022 floods), and cross-sectional correlation between total DRFA events and cumulative FV change (2019→2025).

Test Statistic p-value Key finding

Interpretation

Limitations and caveats. These results should be interpreted with caution due to several constraints inherent in the available data:
  • Annual temporal resolution. Family violence data is available only at annual granularity (calendar year). Disaster effects that peak 3–12 months post-event (Parkinson 2019) are diluted when aggregated to calendar years, which may not align with event timing. Monthly data from CSA (Recommendation 1) would substantially increase statistical power.
  • Ecological fallacy. LGA-level analysis cannot establish that the individuals exposed to disaster are the same individuals involved in FV incidents. The analysis identifies area-level associations, not individual-level causation.
  • Reporting changes. Victoria Police reporting practices, victim willingness to report, and service availability all vary over time. The statewide increase in FV recording may partly reflect improved detection rather than increased incidence. Year fixed effects partially absorb common reporting shifts.
  • Small baseline group. Only 2 of 79 Victorian LGAs had zero DRFA-declared disasters during 2020–2026, limiting the comparison group for simple t-tests (though the panel regressions use within-LGA variation).
  • No population denominator. FV counts are not rate-adjusted. LGAs with rapid population growth (e.g. outer-suburban growth corridors like Casey, Wyndham, Melton) may show FV increases driven by population rather than disaster exposure. Population data from ABS would improve the specification.
  • Treatment timing. DRFA declaration dates do not precisely capture the onset or duration of community impact. Multiple overlapping declarations in the same LGA (e.g. Baw Baw with 21 events) make clean before/after comparisons difficult.

Data sources

The data required to build a dose-response funding model largely exists within Victorian government agencies. Two critical datasets are collected but not published in the form required for LGA-level analysis.

Available datasets

DatasetSourceStatusResolutionGap
FV incidents by LGACrime Statistics Agency Victoria PublishedAnnual by financial year Monthly resolution required for event-study design
DRFA activations by LGANEMA via data.gov.au PublishedPer-event Binary activation only — no household impact severity
AGRN Disaster RegisterDisasterAssist.gov.au PublishedPer-event
Population by LGAAustralian Bureau of Statistics PublishedAnnual
SEIFA disadvantage indexAustralian Bureau of Statistics PublishedCensus 2021
AIDR Disaster Events (Victoria)Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience PublishedPer-event Historical context (163 events to 2010); limited post-2010
LGA household impacts (5 events)Council reports, parliamentary inquiries CompiledPer-event × per-LGA Covers 17 LGAs across 5 events; not comprehensive
Monthly FV by LGACrime Statistics Agency (requires data request) Not publishedMonthly Underlying LEAP data records date and location; only the LGA disaggregation is unpublished
Damage assessments by LGAEmergency Management Victoria (requires data request) Not publishedPer-event × per-LGA Rapid Damage Assessment data exists in DRFA Claims Management System
Critical data gap. Emergency Management Victoria conducts Rapid Damage Assessments after every declared disaster, producing per-LGA counts of dwellings damaged and destroyed. This data is used in DRFA claims processing but is not published. Without it, dose-response analysis at the LGA level is not possible using publicly available data alone. The household impact figures compiled in this evidence base were assembled from council reports, parliamentary submissions, and media coverage — an incomplete and inconsistent substitute for the systematic assessment data held by EMV.

Data downloads

The following datasets are available for download. All source data is provided in the form in which it was obtained, with provenance documented in the accompanying README.

Licensing and attribution

Crime Statistics Agency data is published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. NEMA DisasterAssist data is published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia. AIDR data is published for public use. Council reports and parliamentary submissions are public documents. This compilation is provided for research purposes.

Methodology

The relationship between natural disasters and family violence is established in the literature. The analytical objective of this evidence base is to support quantification of the magnitude and timing of that relationship at the Victorian LGA level, in a form suitable for translation into a disaster recovery funding formula.

Current analysis

Disaster declaration data was obtained from the NEMA DisasterAssist register (data.gov.au) and cross-referenced with the AIDR disaster mapper. LGA-level family violence data was obtained from CSA annual publications. Per-LGA household impact data was compiled from publicly available council reports, parliamentary inquiry submissions, government recovery publications, VAGO audit reports, and local media coverage for five major events (AGRN 882, 969, 1037, 1096, 1108).

The disaster–FV panel dataset merges DRFA activation records with annual FV counts by LGA. This permits descriptive comparison of FV trends in disaster-declared versus non-declared LGAs, but the annual temporal resolution limits causal inference.

Proposed analysis (conditional on data availability)

Difference-in-differences

With monthly FV data by LGA, a difference-in-differences design would compare FV rates in disaster-declared LGAs against non-declared LGAs before and after each event, with LGA and time fixed effects absorbing baseline differences. This would measure the additional FV incidence attributable to disaster impact. The literature suggests FV effects peak 6–12 months post-disaster (Parkinson 2019), which monthly data would capture.

Dose-response modelling

With per-LGA household damage counts from EMV, this analysis would estimate whether LGAs with greater dwelling damage experience proportionally larger FV increases. Count models (Poisson or negative-binomial with population offset) are appropriate given the overdispersion typical of crime data. Chronically affected LGAs such as Baw Baw (16 separate declarations) would require a stacked Callaway–Sant'Anna estimator to handle treatment heterogeneity across multiple events.

Outcome specification

The target output is a coefficient of the form: for each additional N dwellings damaged in an LGA, an estimated Y additional family violence incidents are expected over the following Z months. This coefficient, combined with cost-of-service estimates, would provide the basis for a "social consequence multiplier" in disaster recovery funding allocations.

Processing pipeline

All data processing scripts are included in the source repository. The pipeline consists of: raw data download and cataloguing; LGA name normalisation (mapping council names, shire/city suffixes, and historical names to ABS LGA identifiers); disaster–FV panel construction; household impact extraction from event-specific CSV files; and summary statistics generation.

Recommendations

Two data requests and one policy reform are identified. The data requests are preconditions for the quantitative analysis required to inform the policy reform.

1

Data request: Crime Statistics Agency — Monthly FV incidents by LGA

A request for monthly family violence incident counts by LGA from January 2018 to the most recent available period. The CSA publishes monthly data at the state level and annual data by LGA; the underlying LEAP database records date and location for each incident. The LGA-by-month disaggregation is the minimum temporal resolution required for an event-study design.

info@crimestatistics.vic.gov.au
2

Data request: Emergency Management Victoria — Rapid Damage Assessment data by LGA

A request for per-LGA counts of residential properties assessed by damage category (destroyed, uninhabitable, damaged but habitable, minor damage) for all 53 Victorian DRFA-declared events since October 2020. This data exists within the DRFA Claims Management System and is collected through the Rapid Damage Assessment process conducted after every declared disaster. It is the essential input for dose-response analysis.

emv.info@emv.vic.gov.au
3

Policy reform: Social consequence multiplier in DRFA

The peer-reviewed literature establishes that disasters increase family violence. If the dose-response analysis confirms the magnitude at the Victorian LGA level, the evidence would support inclusion of a social consequence component in DRFA funding allocations. This component would automatically trigger funding for family violence services, emergency housing, and legal assistance in proportion to household impact — allocated prospectively at the point of disaster declaration, based on damage assessment data, rather than retrospectively after services have been overwhelmed.

The analysis assembled in this evidence base, combined with the requested EMV and CSA data, would provide the quantitative basis for specifying the multiplier: for every N dwellings damaged, fund Y additional hours of DV casework, Z emergency housing placements, and W legal assistance sessions.